Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Mar 10, 2026

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 and OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

strong confidence

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads overall

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads in price and context window and max output, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5

No clear advantages identified

Best for with OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

Budget-conscious workflowsLong document processingLong-form content generation

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5 OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
Provider Anthropic OpenAI
Input price $5/M $1/M
Output price $25/M $10/M
Context window 200K 400K
Max output 64K 128K
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
Tool useVisionReasoning
Released Nov 24, 2025 Dec 4, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5

$25/M tokens

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

$10/M tokens

Context Window

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5

200K tokens

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

400K tokens

Capabilities

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5

3/4

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

3/4

Max Output

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5

64K tokens

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

128K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.5

Nov 2025

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

Dec 2025

Related comparisons