Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Mar 10, 2026

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 and OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

moderate confidence

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 and OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max are closely matched across pricing, context, and capabilities. Your choice depends on workflow-specific factors like provider ecosystem preference and existing integrations.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6

Long document processing

Best for with OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

Budget-conscious workflows

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
Provider Anthropic OpenAI
Input price $5/M $1/M
Output price $25/M $10/M
Context window 1.0M 400K
Max output 128K 128K
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
Tool useVisionReasoning
Released Feb 4, 2026 Dec 4, 2025

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max leads

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6

$25/M tokens

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

$10/M tokens

Context Window

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 leads

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6

1.0M tokens

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

400K tokens

Capabilities

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6

3/4

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

3/4

Max Output

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6

128K tokens

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

128K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6

Feb 2026

OpenAI: GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

Dec 2025

Related comparisons