Skip to content
AI Viewer
Model comparison Synced Mar 10, 2026

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.

Verdict

moderate confidence

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads overall

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads in price and capabilities, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 remains competitive with advantages in max output.

Best for with Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6

Long-form content generation

Best for with Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Budget-conscious workflowsMulti-modal tasks

Side-by-side

Technical specifications

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Provider Anthropic Google
Input price $3/M $2/M
Output price $15/M $12/M
Context window 1.0M 1.0M
Max output 128K 66K
Capabilities
Tool useVisionReasoning
Tool useVisionAudioReasoning
Released Feb 17, 2026 Feb 19, 2026

Scoring breakdown

How each dimension compares

Price

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6

$15/M tokens

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

$12/M tokens

Context Window

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6

1.0M tokens

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

1.0M tokens

Capabilities

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6

3/4

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

4/4

Max Output

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6

128K tokens

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

66K tokens

Recency

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6

Feb 2026

Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Feb 2026

Related comparisons