MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Side-by-side comparison of MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Compare pricing, context window, capabilities, and find out which is better for your workflow.
Verdict
marginal confidenceMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 leads overall
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 leads in price, making it the stronger choice for most workflows. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B remains a solid alternative depending on your specific needs.
Side-by-side
Technical specifications
| MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 | Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Kimi / Moonshot AI | Qwen |
| Input price | $0.45/M | $0.39/M |
| Output price | $2/M | $2/M |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Capabilities | Tool useVisionReasoning | Tool useVisionReasoning |
| Released | Jan 26, 2026 | Feb 16, 2026 |
Scoring breakdown
How each dimension compares
Price
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 leadsMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
$2/M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
$2/M tokens
Context Window
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
262K tokens
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
262K tokens
Capabilities
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
3/4
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
3/4
Max Output
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
66K tokens
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
66K tokens
Recency
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
Jan 2026
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Feb 2026
Related comparisons
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
mid tier · Cross-provider
Google: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview) vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
mid tier · Cross-provider
Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
mid tier · Cross-provider
Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
mid tier · Cross-provider